BCI Stays the Resolution Passed by SCBA, Suspends Mr. Ashok Arora

Must Read

An Analysis of Cyber Crimes in India

The term “Cyber Crime” is not defined in Indian law. We can attribute this to the variety and capricious...

Explained: Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Act, 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought various widespread impacts on every sector of the country, whether it is the corporates...

An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Guidelines on the Ambit of Maintenance in Matrimonial Cases

The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines in the Rajesh vs. Neha case relating to the ambit of maintenance...

Explained: The OTT Regulations and Their Impact on the Media Future in India

The regulation of content within OTT (Over-the-Top) media and other digital media have fallen under the purview of the...

Frustration of Lease in COVID-19 Times

Introduction The year 2020 has been the most unexpected and the year of most unprecedented events in the history of...

Do All Insults Come Under the Ambit of SC/ST Act as Offence?

Introduction The Honourable Supreme court of India held that all insults or intimidation are not an offence under the Scheduled...

Follow us

Brief Facts of the Case

The Bar Council of India passed a resolution on 11th May 2020. The resolution stayed the decision to suspend its Secretary, Shri Ashok Arora. The Council decided in favour of Mr. Ashok Arora. This was against the resolution passed by the Executive Committee of SCBA dated 08.05.2020. The resolution, dated 08.05.2020 was passed by the Supreme Court Bar Association. It suspended the Secretary and divested him of his powers as Secretary.

Views of the Council

The Council is of the view that this is an extreme case. Additionally, it is one that has a far-reaching effect on the workings of Bar Associations of the country. Meanwhile, they mentioned that Members appeared in a very distressful manner at the turn of events at SCBA. They considered the view that there has been damage caused to the dignity, prestige & honour of the Bar. The reason being the tussle and fight among the Members of the Executive Committee.

Chain of events following the Suspension

Mr. Ashok Arora submitted his representation to the BCI. Later, only the chain of events that took place between 6th May to 8th May was taken into account by the Council.

The SCBA held a programme to bid farewell to Hon’ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta on the 6th of May, 2020. The Honorary Secretary of SCBA conducts the proceedings of the programme. But the President and some other Members kept Mr. Ashok Arora out of the programme.

On the same day, Mr. Ashok Arora sent an email to the Executive Committee Members. The email was for the removal of Mr. Dushyant Dave from the post of President and primary membership of SCBA. Additionally, another email that was sent included information for holding an “Emergent General Meeting’. This was to discuss the agenda, including the removal of Mr. Dushyant Dave. Further, Mr. Dushyant Dave responded to the notice by denying all claims made by Mr. Ashok Arora. He then informed them that he would continue to serve throughout his tenure.

The proposed General Meeting on 8th May adjourned sine die. The Courts were of the view that the decision was a sensible and mature way of handling the situation. Yet, the events that follow next were baffling to the Council. The President along with the Executive Committee met and passed several resolutions. One of the resolutions was to suspend the Honorary Secretary. Subsequently, the Joint Secretary received that position.

What members have to say

“The Executive Committee subsequently passed the resolution on 8th May 2020. It considered suspending Mr. Ashok Arora, beyond the powers of the Executive Committee. However, the members found it illegal, cavalier, undemocratic, and autocratic in nature. It is vindictive on the face of it. The general body of Members of SCBA elected Mr. Arora as Honorary Secretary in full capacity. The Executive Committee which consists of elected members cannot suspend him now. It is a mindboggling misuse and abuse of its position by the Executive Committee. Further, any other body conferring such power, later would not take any action to the person concerned. So, the impugned Resolution of the Executive Committee is illegal and arbitrary. It is also against the principles of natural justice.”

On the other hand, the majority of Members of the Bar shocked to see this act of a few members of the Executive Committee of SCBA.

Current situation

It is thus believed that the illegal resolution passed by the Executive Committee cannot remain in force. As it will result in irretrievable injustice to an elected office bearer of SCBA. Thus, the BCI resolved to stay the resolution dated 08.05.2020 passed by the Executive Committee of SCBA. Hence, the resolution stayed with immediate effect. Also, under Section 35 or 36 of the Advocates Act, 1961, and BCI Rules, the actions of the Members of the Executive Committee are misconduct. Presently, the decision of the actions being misconduct will remain open for the Court to decide in the future if the need arises.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

 

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -