A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing Writ of Certiorari to call for records on the impugned order dated 27.05.2021 on the file of Respondent No. 2 and quash the same as illegal.
A petition was filed for issuing a writ of certiorarified Mandamus for calling of the records of the 4th respondent in the proceedings dated 03.06.2021. It was prayed to quash the proceedings till date, the license fee for the complete lockdown period to COVID-19 pandemic, and direct the respondents to grant a waiver of the license fee from:
1.)24.03.2020 to 06.09.2020
2.)20.02.2021 to the date when the transport services resume and replace, revise and re-fix the license fee in a manner proportionate with the time permitted for vehicle movement from 07.09.2020 in respect of the two-wheeler parking facility at Nachimuthu Maternity Hospital, Pollachi Municipality.
A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property.
A petition was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution for issuing a writ of Mandamus for calling of records relating to the order dated 30.01.2017 passed by the 2nd Respondent. It was prayed to quash the same and to consequently forbear 3rd Respondent from interfering with the Petitioner’s right in the property.
The Central information commission decided on a case dated June 11th where the appellant filled more than 200 RTI applications and still didn’t receive any response from the PIO. Further, the commission directed the CPIO to be careful with matters related to RTI. Later, the commission disposed of the appeal because no interference was needed.
The Central Information Commission decided on a case dated June 14th, 2021 where it directed the PIO to administer a reply concerning some given dates filled by the Appellant within six weeks taking necessary endorsement under section 5(4) of the RTI Act.
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal decided on a case that was already under the Punjab state commission, the grievances known were the arrest of a debtor. The court not only understood the reason behind the detention but also didn’t find any accurate reason for intervention and accordingly disposed of the appeal.
A division bench of the Bombay high court had delivered a split verdict on the constitutionality of Section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act which imposes GST liability on services provided by intermediaries to persons located outside India.
The Bombay High Court has held that the Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd., owners of the IPL team Deccan Chargers were rewarded even though they were clearly in breach of their contractual obligations towards the Board of Cricket Control of India (BCCI).
Bombay High Court acquitted a life convict accused of murder since there was not enough legal, reliable, and unimpeachable evidence. The court also quashed the judgment made by the Additional Sessions Judge and ordered for the refund of the fine amounts for the same.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
