On 6.05.2021, the Karnataka High Court had allowed an appeal of criminal nature in part relating to the subject of homicidal death.
The Court observed that the grounds urged by the respondents in their Objections about the use of premises in question being without a license did not form the basis of the issuance of the impugned Order.
The Petitioner prays to receive interest on the refund amount under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 from the Respondents.
Different petitioners have filed several petitions claiming the pensions to the teaching and non-teaching employees of Dibrugarh University. The Respondents blamed several withstanding issues as an excuse for not paying the required amount timely.
The Jammu and Kashmir High Court heard the Petitioner of the present case dealing with Article 21 of the Constitution of India and said that they shall be allowed to live their married life the way they desire as guaranteed by the Constitution.
In this order, the Tribunal had checked the validity of the complaint filed by the Complainant.
About ILR Indraprastha Law Review is an eJournal of the University School of Law and Legal Studies (USLLS) under the aegis of Guru Gobind Singh
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
