This case revolves around the applicability of Sections 227 and 228 of the CrPC. The Respondents, in this case, alleged that the Trial Court had conducted a mini-trial at the stage of framing of charges which was not permissible.
On 6.05.2021, the Karnataka High Court had passed a judgment on a matter filed via Regular First Appeal against the order passed by a lower court regarding the recovery of money. The court exclaimed that the Courts could not encourage “sophistry” and “hairsplitting” while discussing the without prejudice rule.
The division bench of Chief Justice Akil Kureshi and Justice S. Talapatra passed an order in WP(C)(PIL) No.9/2020. The court ordered the state government to take care of the health of prison inmates and children of orphanages.
Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the group of petitioners are cross petitions preferred by the employers and employees in the present group of petitions, where all the appeals preferred by the employers are dismissed, and those preferred by the employees are allowed partly in the above terms.
Adv. Utkarsha Nikam has working experience as an Associate (Real Estate) at Kanga & Co. She is currently the Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief at the Indian Real Estate Blawg (IRB). She has authored several articles in reputed journals and blogs. In this interview, she talks about her experience through her college and job. She further discusses concepts like specialization and internships. She takes us through her journey of selection at Queen Mary University which is a dream of many law aspirants.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
