Brief Facts The Petitioner was appointed as a TGT (Trained graduate teacher) in 1990 in the Respondent’s institution. At the time of promotion, 2 available
The Tripura High Court gave a verdict in WP(C) No.1256 of 2019. The Court reasoned that for stepping up the pay of the juniors to that of the senior both need to be of the same cadre. The Court dismissed the petition filed by some assistant teachers.
The Bombay High Court on Wednesday quashed an FIR against Sunaina Holey, a Navi Mumbai resident who had been booked under SECTION 153A of the IPC, for reposting a video along with a comment criticizing the gathering of migrant workers outside Bandra Masjid during the lockdown on 14th April 2020.
Heeralal Samariya, Information Commissioner will decide the Second Appeal filed by the Appellant.
The Divisional Bench consisting of Justice Anant Bijay Singh and Justice Kanthi Narahari will decide whether there need to be any changes in the order passed on 17th March 2021. They will decide whether there needs to be changed in the prayer of the impugned order.
Amita Pandove, Information Commissioner will decide the Second Appeal filed by the Appellant.
A Criminal Appeal was filed by the Appellants aggrieved by the Order of the High Court flipping the Trial Court’s decision of acquitting the accused on charges of murder and grievous hurt.
This petition was filed against the judgment dated 28.11.2018 passed by the High Court of Allahabad whereby the Chief Judicial Magistrate refused to discharge the appellant in N.C.R. No.120/2012 under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
The Petitioner was having trouble getting an e-pass that restricted the movement due to the lockdown order issued on 19th April 2021. Thus, he filed an application seeking exemption from filing affirmed affidavits.
The Appellant was convicted of the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 498(A), read with 34 of IPC of Indian Penal Code. The Original Accused Nos. 2 to 4 were also held guilty under Section 498(A) read with 34 of IPC. This appeal is challenging the correctness of the Order passed by the Trial Court.
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
