The petition says: The move to manufacture the said vaccine commercially and distribute it to the general public as a safe vaccine is totally dishonest and goes against the WHO guidelines, as also the safety norms laid down by the 2019 Rules.
The infamous gold smuggling case of Kerala being charged was charged under the UAPA in addition to the Customs Act by the National Investigation Agency (NIA). The division bench of the Kerala High Court contended on whether the said act of gold smuggling can be considered a criminal offence.
The Additional Chief Metropolitan Chief Magistrate Aakash Jain who heard the case remanded Disha Ravi to 3 more days of judicial custody. This is following her 5 days of remand in police custody.
This case discussed whether the arbitration clause in a contract between the state instrumentality and a private developer bars the writ jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226.
This case concerns a bail application of a person accused of an offence of sedition under Section 124A IPC.
Advocate Nagamani who filed the PIL in the High Court had prayed for the filing of an FIR and a judicial enquiry in the said incident. It is stated that after the filing of the PIL the couple had received death threats from the police department.
The petition filed alleged that the act of leaking information, especially that of her private WhatsApp chats with third parties which are not even verified “is a clear violation of the provisions of the Cable Sections the Cable Televisions Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995
In the light of previous decisions, the High Court allowed the present appeals and also, the contested awards for modification. Further, it entitled the appellant’s additional compensation in case of the same lands.
We are also of the view that two years have passed and the possibility of recovery of electronic records at this distance of time is remote, especially since the scope of the enquiry and the power of the learned Judge is limited, no useful purpose will be served by continuing these proceedings.
Excerpt In the judgment passed by the Supreme Court on 19 February 2021, it was held that banks could not wash their hands off from
Subscribe to our newsletter and receive a curated selection of legal updates directly to your inbox.
