NGT Rejects Plea for Allowing Chhhat Puja in Eco-Sensitive Rabindra Sarobar Lake

Must Read

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions,...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by...

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Follow us

Excerpt

The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench rejected the plea of state agency Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) for granting permission for Chhat Puja in Rabindra Sarobar with restrictions. It upheld its previous Order banning any such ritual there to save its ecosystem. This Order was dated 17th September 2020.

Brief Facts

KMDA functions under the State Urban Development Department. They recently moved the NGT East Zone seeking permission to allow Chhath Puja rituals in the waterbody plagued by pollution. In 2016, the NGT had allowed Chhath puja to be performed in the lake for that year only under certain regulations. Next year, the Court had ordered that no Chhath Puja rituals would be allowed anymore to prevent pollution of the lake. However, in 2018 and 2019, thousands of devotees forcefully entered the lake area and performed Chhath Puja rituals.
 
On the reason behind moving the NGT again, KMDA CEO Antara Acharya said, “It is religious sentiment involved and many women and children gather at the spot. It is difficult to prevent them from entering the lake compound.”

Arguments 

KMDA claimed before the Tribunal that there is in deference to the religious sentiment of people.
 
They also argued that there could be a law and order problem as thousands of devotees broke open locked gates of the sprawling lake area last year and offered puja violating the NGT orders.

Analysis

The NGT rejected and passed the Judgment for the first time dated 15th November 2017. The Applicant sought a review of this Judgment.
 
Similarly, in the matter dated 13/01/2015 regarding pollution of river Yamuna, the NGT on Thursday held Sri Ravi Shankar’s Art of Living was responsible for the damage to the Yamuna floodplains caused by the holding of the World Culture Festival, 2016.

Court’s Observation and Decision

A Bench of Justice S.P. Wangdi and two expert members found that:
 
“….The grounds set out for condonation of 944 days in filing the application do not fall within the meaning of sufficient cause that prevented the Applicant from filing the M.A. No. 01/2020 and is, accordingly, rejected on this ground also.”
 
They rejected the Petition and directed KMDA to ensure that its earlier Order of not allowing anyone on the premises of the lake on the Chhat Puja days in November is strictly enforced this time.

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -