NGT Asks Panel Committee To Look Into Ambegaon Garbage Plant

Must Read

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2)...

Authority Cannot Interfere With Legal Heir Certificate When There Are No Issues Between 2 Wives: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India in Madras High Court. The case of Lakshmi Jagannathan v....

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification of Bar Council on Spot Admission

On 23rd November 2020, the Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the Honourable Smt. Justice P.V....

Death in Police Custody Requires Post-Mortem: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Madras High Court. The case of S....

Follow us

The National Green Tribunal (NGT), dated 17th November 2020, directed a joint committee of the central and state pollution control boards to be constituted to look into the grievances and take the necessary action. The petition was filed after a massive fire broke out at the said point on November 1, wherein it had been alleged that locals had vandalized the facility and indulged in arson. 

Brief Facts

On 10th November 2020, the application was filed by Ambegaon residents Dhananjay Khokate and Jaysing Jadhav before the NGT. Parties to it include the Union of India, State of Maharashtra, Chairman of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) authority, Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) & PMC. The application stated that the city is at a stake with repeated incidents of fire at the garbage plants. The application further stated that PMC has been towards the waste processing facility where the fire broke out recently. PMC illegally started the waste processing plant in February 2020, by cutting down numerous trees. Also, the plant was functioning without obtaining the certificate. Finally, after the fire broke out, the entire area was covered with smoke and about 5000 people were affected and had difficulty breathing.

Arguments Before the Court

The applicant argued before the Bench that the plant is in blatant violation of environmental norms and all the plants and trees in and around the city of Pune need to be inspected for compliance strictly by the committee.

Further, the applicants argued that defaulters who are making the city a dumping ground should be punished in accordance with the law.

The applicants also stated to stop and cancel the project by imposing environmental compensations on the operator and contractor.

Analysis

The plant, run by the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC), was in the news on November 1st, 2020, when a fire broke out, extensively damaging costly machinery installed in the recent past.

The garbage plant has been set up at a cost of Rs. 4 crores and became functional a few months ago. However, it is facing stiff opposition from the local residents who have mainly raised health concerns. They have also drawn support from local representatives.

Court’s Observation & Decision

After hearing the contentions of the applicants, the Principal Bench, headed by Justice AK Goel, comprising of members Sheo Kumar Singh, Nagin Nanda decided to opt for setting a joint panel. The Bench directed the constitution of Joint committee of CPCB, MPCB, and collector of Pune. The state PCB will be the nodal agency for compliance and coordination. The Tribunal told this expert panel to submit the action report before 23rd March 2021.

The Bench further directed the applicants to forward a set of papers relating to the matter to the CPCB, MPCB, and the district collector.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

Authority Cannot Interfere With Legal Heir Certificate When There Are No Issues Between 2 Wives: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India in Madras High Court. The case of Lakshmi Jagannathan v. The Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Chennai. was...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Notification of Bar Council on Spot Admission

On 23rd November 2020, the Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the Honourable Smt. Justice P.V. Asha heard the case of...

Death in Police Custody Requires Post-Mortem: Madras High Court

The petition, filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in Madras High Court. The case of S. Prema v. The Superintendent of...

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order and states “Liberty of a Citizen cannot be taken away in the Absence of Lawyer”

In the case of Parveen v. State of Haryana, the Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that “a citizen’s liberty cannot be taken away”. This observation...

Revised Gratuity Ceiling Notified by Central Government Applicable To All Establishments Irrespective of Whether Controlled by the State or Centre: Tripura High Court

In the case of Sri Tapas Guha vs Tripura Tea Development Corporation Ltd. and others, a single-judge bench comprising of Hon’ble Justice Akil Kureshi...

Madras High Court Dismisses Tax Case Appeal by OPG Energy Pvt. Ltd.

The OPG Energy Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was filed against an order passed...

Jharkhand High Court Disposes of Criminal Revision Petition Against the Judgment Passed by the Learned Sessions Judge With Modification

A criminal revision petition against the Judgment dated 23.07.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Criminal Appeal No.49/2014 was...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -