NCLAT Jeopardizes Independence of Judiciary

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Since a lot of controversies have approached, when there’s a recent nomination of former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, to Rajya Sabha by BJP. This controversy opened the debate regarding judicial independence.

Similarly, A writ petition Fozia Rahman V UOI [W.P.(C) 3536/2020], filed regarding the appointment of officiating chairperson of NCLAT. On August 14, 2020, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) is completed five months after the former chairman Justice (Retd.) Shri S.J. Mukhopadhaya retired at 70 years of age, in accordance with Section 413, Companies Act 2013. The Centre has been appointed Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat, Member (Judicial), NCLAT, as officiating Chairperson in terms of Rule 10(1) of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 for a period of three months with effect from 15.03.2020 or until a regular Chairperson is appointed or until further orders, whichever is earliest.

Fozia Rahman argued that this appointment was contrary to Section 415 of the Companies Act, 2013 as well as the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualifications, Experience and other Condition of Service of Members) Rules, 2020.

It has been contended in the petition that the law mandates that the Senior-most member to act as the “Acting Chairperson” and thus the Central Government was not empowered to overlook seniority in case of appointment of a member, whether judicial or technical, to officiate someone as Chairperson. The argument of the petition was that since Justice Bhat isn’t the senior-most member at NCLAT, his appointment can’ be sustained.

It was further submitted that Rule 10 of the Tribunal Rules cannot be read to suggest that in cases where the Tribunal concerned doesn’t have designations like ‘Vice-Chairperson/ Vice-Chairman/ Vice-President’, such as NCLAT, any member can be appointed irrespective of seniority.

The ground for the petition read as: “
Whereas Justice (Retd.) Shri Bansi Lal Bhat, appointed as officiating Chairperson on 17.07.2020, Hon’ble Mr. Balvinder Singh, Member (Technical) was appointed on 01.07.2016 and Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.I.S. Cheema, Member (Judicial) was appointed on 11.09.2017 and are both members holding greater seniority.”

The Delhi HC has issued notice and given time to the Respondents to file a reply, the next day of the hearing is scheduled from August 28, 2020. In 2019, the Supreme Court held in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd, that the judicial appointments must be free from the influence of the executive so that the constitutional spirit of independence of the judiciary could be maintained.

Similarly in L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India, the Supreme Court held that For a number of reasons that the Ministry should appropriately be the Ministry of Law. It would be open for the Ministry, in its turn, to appoint an independent supervisory body to oversee the working of the Tribunals.

Evidently, in the past 3 years, 16 judges of the Supreme Court have retired. Also, a number of Chief Justices of High Courts are available for the appointment as a chairperson. Surprisingly, the continuation of appointment of the same judge with the Chairperson is extending.

And again the debate rises about the independence of the judiciary. Again the judiciary has shown their greediness. Again there will be an increase in lack of trust by the public. It was the late law minister and Senior Advocate Shri Arun Jaitley, who highlighted the ‘post-retirement appointment’ of judges and talked about transparency.

Therefore, there is a need for a fair procedure for selection of candidates and appointment to the most preferred personalities. Such checks could be created either by an amendment of the constitution or by an interpretation which could be justified under the constitution. Otherwise, the day is not far when people will be having a second thought in a mind to trust the Indian Judiciary.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -