Supreme Court Sets Aside Order of Trial Court, Says Evidence on Record Was Not Appreciated

Must Read

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Follow us

The present case is that of Parminder Kaur alias P. P. Kaur alias Soni v. State of Punjab, wherein the bench consisted of J. N. V. Ramana, J. Surya Kant, and J. Krishna Murari. The Supreme Court, ordinarily, does not re-appreciate the evidence. However, in cases where courts below delay with evidence in a mechanical manner, the Court draws an exception.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The present case is a criminal appeal. It arises out of the judgment of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. Therein, the Court confirmed the conviction of the Appellant. The Appellant is convicted under Sections 366A and 506 of IPC. 

On 24.02.1996 an FIR was recorded against the Appellant. The incident alleged in FIR had happened a week prior. The Appellant called the prosecutrix to her house. Thereafter, the Appellant tried to entice the prosecutrix to engage in illicit intercourse with her tenant. The prosecutrix was confined in a room, bolted from outside. Hearing the screams, prosecutor’s father unlocked the door. The matter was not reported until a week later. 

Proceedings at Trial Court

The prosecution examined five witnesses. The age of the prosecutrix was proved by the headmistress of the school. The Appellant examined one witness and offered an alternate version. The Appellant claimed that there was no tenant. And that the case was motivated by revenge. The alternate version was rejected by the trial Court. Thereby, convicted the Appellant.

Proceedings at High Court

Absence of evidence proving enmity between parties, the High Court observed the alternate story as an afterthought. Further, the delay in filing FIR was explained-away as result of family reputation. 

Arguments before the Court 

It has been submitted that there are many discrepancies in the testimonies of the witnesses. The lack of attempt to catch the tenant, shows that the story is concocted. The statement of the Appellant under Section 313 of CrPC was denied without due consideration. Lastly, the case was registered with a motive of revenge. Per contra, it was submitted that findings of the Trial Court were correct. 

Court’s View

The Court analysed the findings of the Trial Court. The Court observed that many aspects were ignored by the Trial Court. With respect to dismissing of reasonable doubts the Court made the following observation:

“It is indisputable that parents would not ordinarily endanger the reputation of their minor daughter merely to falsely implicate their opponents, but such clichés ought not to be the sole basis of dismissing reasonable doubts created and/or defences set out by the accused.”  

A more important observation was regarding the delay in filing the FIR. The Court could not accept the fact that a father would delay filing a complaint. Furthermore, it was observed that no medical examination was performed of the victim. Nor was the Panchayat or any social forum approached, till the second incident. The prosecution has acquiesced to disappearance of the tenant. The tenant was about to allegedly commit a sexual offence. 

The Court further emphasized on the shoddy investigation. The Court found glaring omission in the maps submitted. The Court referred to Takhaji Hiraji v. Thakore Kubersing Chamansing and others, (2001) 6 SCC 145. The Court therein emphasised on examination of independent witnesses. It stated that non-examination of independent witnesses adversely affects the prosecution’s case.  

The Court made observations regarding re-appreciation of evidence. Generally, the SC ought not to re-appreciate evidence. However, the Court made the following observation:

“…where   the   courts   below   have   dealt   with   the material record in a cavalier or mechanical manner which is likely to   cause   gross   injustice,  then   this   Court   in   such   exceptional circumstances may justifiably re­appraise the evidence to advance the cause of justice. There is no gainsaying that such re­assessment ought not to take place routinely and ought not to become substitution of an otherwise plausible view taken by the Courts below.”

The Court found that the prosecutrix stated that there were 2 people when she came out of the room. However, her father stated there were three. Further, the description of the male tenant by the prosecutrix and her father differ. While one witness suggested running after the tenant, another stated no one tried to chase. Additionally, testimonies of the witnesses all differ on the point of FIR. The Court further found inconsistencies. 

The Court further observed that an opportunity under Section 313 of CrPC is a valuable right. The Court referred to Reena Hazarika v. State of Assam, (2019) 13 SCC 289, ¶ 19. Therein the Court commented on failure of the trail court to consider Section 313 statement. It stated that failure to apply its mind and consider the defence could endanger the conviction. Hence, due regard must be given to the accused’s alternate version. 

Court’s Decision

The Court held that the prosecution failed to discharge its burden. The burden to prove guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Thereby, they allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction and sentence awarded.    


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

Uttarakhand High Court Directed State Authorities To Frame SOP Regarding Kumbh Mela 2021

Noticing the commencement date of Kumbh Mela 2021 amid pandemic from 27 February 2021, the Uttarakhand High Court on Monday expressed concern with regard to organizing and conducting of the Mela and directed State Authorities to discuss and resolve the logistical problems which can come in organizing the Mela during the pandemic time.

Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Mahindra Finance, Being a Purely Private Body: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court reiterated that Writ Petition against the purely private body is not maintainable and dismissed the petition which was filed against Mahindra Finance Bank as Arif Khan v. Branch Manager Mahindra Finance Sultanpur & Another.

Publication of Notices for Inter-Faith Marriages No Longer Mandatory: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has passed a landmark judgment that likely brings relief to inter-faith marriage. The Court on Wednesday said that the mandatory publication of Notices of Inter-Faith marriages will now be optional to protect the Privacy and Liberty of the Couple. The Court observed that the publication of the notice would “invade the fundamental rights of liberty and privacy”. Therefore, it has made it optional for the couple, they can now request in form of writing to a marriage officer to publish or not to publish a notice regarding the marriage.

Bombay High Court to NIA: Consider Health and Age of Varavara Rao Before Opposing His Bail Plea

The Bombay HC on Wednesday observed that ‘we are all humans’ and asked the National Investigation Agency and the Maharashtra Government to consider the health and age of the Telugu poet-activist Varavara Rao before making submissions in response to his bail plea application on medical grounds.

Supreme Court Agrees To Examine Centre’s Plea To Keep Adultery a Crime in Armed Forces

The Centre appealed to the Supreme court on Wednesday, pleading that the 2018 judgment of decriminalizing adultery under IPC must not apply to the armed forces. The Supreme Court in a path-breaking verdict in 2018 decriminalized adultery and declared all its provisions unconstitutional as it diminishes the value of women, but maintained that it continues to be a ground for divorce.

Supreme Court Examines the Pollution in Yamuna River for the Second Time

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made a second attempt to clean the Yamuna river by taking a Suo Moto Cognizance of significantly high levels of ammonia water discharged from neighbouring states like Haryana into Delhi.

Fetus Suffering From Anencephaly, Woman’s Plea To Terminate 28-Weeks Pregnancy Allowed by Delhi HC

Based on the report of the medical board constituted by AIIMS, the Delhi High Court on Monday allowed a petition filed by a woman seeking the termination of her 28-weeks pregnancy. They said in its report that the fetus suffered from anencephaly, a disorder where the skull bone is not developed and was thus incompatible with life, therefore her fetus can be aborted.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -