Supreme Court Quashes the Decision of NLSIU for Conducting NLAT, Despite Being a Member of the Consortium

Must Read

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner....

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Follow us

Facts

NLSIU is a premier university that was established with the initiative of the Supreme Court and Karnataka High Court in the footsteps of NUJS and NALSAR. It provides 5 years B.A.LLB course, among others. All the NLUs hold a common test for the admission of their students. This was decided in 2007 and was a great relief for law aspirants. This exam was conducted in different centres throughout the whole country. Since then, the number of NLUs kept increasing and there are currently 23 NLUs in India. In 2018, there was a meeting for a more efficient and transparent exam and the vice-chancellor of NLSIU was made as ex-offico secretary. The Consortium efficiently conducted CLAT 2019 exam offline. In the academic year 2020-21, CLAT was to be held on 21.05.2020 but due to the pandemic and nation wise lockdown imposed, CLAT was postponed to 29.6.2020 online. Then again it was postponed to 7.8.2020 and then to 28.9.2020. 

NLSIU conducted a faculty meeting discussing to prevent the “zero year” and if there were any more delays, the VC of NLSIU had the power to conduct a separate exam. Thereafter, the VC declared a separate examination for the year 2020-21 called NLAT. After a Petition was filed, the Court asked NLSIU to conduct exams but not to declare results. 

Arguments

Nidhesh Gupta appearing for the Petitioner pointed out that the NLAT examination breached the statutory provision of the Act. The Petitioner also submitted that 76,000 students registered for CLAT out of which only 1/3rd registered for NLAT and said that there was no transparency and reliability of the test as retest papers were leaked and students might have cheated. The test was to be given online from home and only the ones who could meet the technical support could attend the exam. The poor students were therefore deprived. Further, the Petitioner argued that NLSIU could not conduct its entrance exam while being a member of the Consortium and said that the decision of the VC of NLSIU is very risky as it puts thousands of aspirants in hardship who sought to enrol in NLSIU. Counsel also argued that the executive council cannot take any decision without concurring with the academic council. 

Arvind Datar appearing for the Respondent contended that the executive council needed to accord with the academic council only when there was any amendment of any regulation. Here, there was no amendment relating to the conducting of NLAT. It was only for maintaining the standard of education and the executive council was entitle to make rules and regulations. Justice Bhushan asked about the students deprived because of its premier nature and asked to address the issue of Article 14 violation. Justice Bhushan also asked that the Respondent was registered under society and held CLAT. Being governed by the Consortium, they could not go against that mandate. Datar said that NLSIU was part of the society and asked the Consortium to conduct the examination early as NLSIU had a trimester system. A delay in it could cause zero years. No response was given from the Consortium. Datar also submitted that NLSIU did not exit the consortium but is not a part of it for the year 2020-21. Regarding the paper leak, he said there was some malpractice on which FIR was lodged. Justice Bhushan asked about why only 2000 students appeared for the examination, it was more due to the shortage of time for registration. In response to this, Respondents argued that 9 days were given which was enough for the registration. To ensure safety, an online examination was conducted.  

Observation

NLSIU conducting its entrance exam would put students in hardship, and the VC of NLSIU kept this decision in the dark earlier. The zero year justification made by NLSIU was bogus and rejected as there were several other modes to suitably modify the academic year. The NLUs came together to increase the standard of legal education, and the decision of NLSIU goes against the said objective. The Court asked the Consortium to conduct CLAT examination early to enable studies to be started from mid-October.

Court’s Decision

A Supreme Court Bench compromising of Justice Bushan, Justice R Shah and Justice Reddy struck down the decision of NLSIU of conducting a separate entrance examination NLAT and directed to admit the students based on CLAT scores.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

UK Supreme Court Rules in Favour of Policyholders in the COVID-19 Business Interruption Case

The United Kingdom’s Supreme Court finally concluded the long-awaited COVID-19 business interruption case brought by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Hiscox Action...

Kerala High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Grounds That Reliefs Sought Are Already in Process of Being Granted, Directs State to Complete the...

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Shircy V. gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner. This writ is filed by...

Supreme Court Directs Government To Provide Free Education To Minor Children of Rape Victims

The Deputy Commissioner of Ranchi was directed by the Supreme Court on Wednesday to make sure that minor children of rape victims are ensured free education till they attain the age of 14 years. The Court made the observation while hearing a plea filed by a woman who claimed that she belonged to the SC/ST group from Jharkhand. She was forced by a man after which her father lodged a complaint.

Aadhar Review Plea Rejected in a 4:1 Verdict by Supreme Court

The petition seeking the re-examination of the 2018 Aadhar Verdict which declares the Aadhar act constitutional and valid was dismissed by a 5-judge bench in a 4:1 verdict. In January the petitions were considered by a bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan, and B R Gavai in the chamber and the order was up on the website on Wednesday.

New Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) Amendments Are Valid Says Supreme Court

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court upheld the amendments in the insolvency and bankruptcy code which makes it mandatory for a minimum of 100 or 10% of home buyers of a project to initiate insolvency proceedings against a builder for not delivering flats or commercial shops on time.

[HUL – Sebamed Ad War] Bombay High Court Passed Injunction; Permits Sebamed Ad Against HUL’s Dove

The ad war between the German personal care brand Sebamed and the consumer goods giant Hindustan Unilever Ltd (HUL) has come to an end. On January 19th, Bombay High Court passed an injunction order permitting the Sebamed ad against Hindustan Unilever’s Dove without any changes. It was observed that Sebamed ads were backed with evidence-based data. However, Sebamed was ordered to put an end to its advertisement that compared HUL soap bars Lux, Pears, and Santoor with Rin and detergent category.

Bombay High Court Says White Collar Crimes Are More Dangerous Than Murder and Dacoity

The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court rejected 4 petitions of 4 businessmen after observing that white-collar crimes are more serious than murder and dacoity. The businesspersons were booked for fraud of evading GST by producing fake invoices.

Right To Protection Can’t Be Granted To Married Woman Involved in Live-in Relationship: Allahabad High Court

The Bench of Allahabad High Court dismissed a petition of a live-in couple, observing that a married woman in a live-in relationship is not entitled to any sort of legal protection whatsoever. The Court remarked that they are adults and should live as ‘husband and wife’ if they want no one to interfere in their lives.

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -