Supreme Court: Mere Designation as Director in a Company Does Not Imply Liability

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

A division bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice R. Subhash Reddy heard the case of Shailendra Swarup v. Deputy Director of Enforcement Directorate. The Apex Court explained that the liability for an offence under Section 68 of Foreign Exchange and Regulation Act, 1973. It depends on the role one plays in the affairs of the company and not on mere designation or status.

Brief facts of the case

The Appellant was the Director of Modi Xerox Limited, later amalgamated and merged into another company, referred to as XMC. He was also a practising advocate of the Supreme Court. MXL made 20 remittances through his banker. The company did not submit the Exchange Control Copies of custom bills to the Reserve Bank of India, despite repeated reminders. These bills were to serve the purpose of evidence for imports into India.

The Enforcement Directorate after many hearings passed an order. It charged the company under section 8(3) read with 8(4) and Section 58 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (“FERA Act”). It imposed a penalty upon XMC, the new company. Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange dismissed the appeal of the Appellant. Further, the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal too. Following which, the present appeal has been filed.

Appellant’s Arguments

A Sundaram, Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that the High Court committed error in dismissing the appeal. The Appellant was not in charge of the conduct of the business of XMC. Just because the statement specifying Directors of the company included the Appellant, does not imply responsibility upon the Appellant. He stated that the Appellant was only a part-time, non-executive Director of XMC. He was not an employee of the company and also did not have any executive roles in the company.

Respondent’s Arguments

The Additional Solicitor General by refuting the claims of the Appellant justified the penalty imposed on him. He submits that the proceedings initiated against the Appellant were under Section 51 of the FERA Act. And hence, the burden of proof lies on the Appellant to prove he had no role to play in the company.

Court’s Observation

The first point for consideration before the Bench was, if the defence of the Appellant being only part-time, the non-executive director was an afterthought. It observed that the first reply sent for the adjudication notice was made by the Company Secretary, and not by any Directors involved. Later, the Appellant submitted his reply affidavit stated his limited role in the company. The reply by the Appellant was in line with the prior reply by the Company Secretary. High Court hence erred in dismissing this plea as a mere afterthought. The second issue revolves around the proof of such a limited role. The Bench also accepted the affidavit submitted by the Appellant as evidence to prove his role in the company.

The third issue was about charging the Appellant under Section 8(3), 8(4) and Section 68 of the FERA, 1973. Here, the Court held that there existed nothing to prove that the Appellant was liable for the contravention of the above provisions.

The Bench agreed with the judgement in S.M.S Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla 2005 8 SCC 89. Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1981 is to be considered similar in application to Section 68 of the FERA Act. These sections dealing with the offences by companies in the same manner.

Court’s Decision

The presumption that the Directors of a company being in charge of the affairs of the company is rebuttable. When adjudicating authority proceeds to impose a penalty for contravention of FERA Act, essential ingredients constituting offence have to be satisfied. These ingredients also have to be read with Section 68 of the Act. Further, such charges have to be communicated to the person along with an adequate opportunity for representation to defend.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -