Supreme Court Allows COVID-19 Positive Student To Sit for CLAT Examination

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Monday, allowed a COVID-19 positive student to appear for the CLAT 2020 exam on the same day.

Brief Facts of the Case

This plea was filed as a clarification to the judgment in Rakesh Kumar Agarwalla and Anr v NLSIU, Bengaluru. This petition has also been filed against the order passed by the CLAT Consortium. It denied aspirants suffering from COVID-19 from appearing, as they were not providing isolation rooms at the exam centres of such affected aspirants. This is in contravention to the provision in the Admit Cards issued, which state that isolation rooms or centres will be provided.

A COVID-19 positive aspirant named Deepansh Tripathi filed the present plea before the Court.

Arguments

Advocate Garima Parshad and Sumit Chandra appeared on behalf of the Applicant. They argued that this latest order of the Consortium is a violation of the Applicant’s right under Article 14 of the Indian Constitution. It is submitted that this prohibition on the aspirants from taking the examination is infringing upon their right to be treated as an equal, and their right to be allowed to appear from the examinations.

The Applicant cited the statement of NLSIU Vice-Chancellor where he had assured that the highest standards of health and safety protocols will be followed at the test centres. Additionally, he communicated the classification of test centres into two – general testing rooms and isolation rooms.

The Applicant urged the Court to pass a general order since there are many such aggrieved aspirants.

Court’s Observation

The Bench heard the plea and took notice of the paucity of time, as the examination was to be conducted on that very same day.

The Court accepted the application. They asked the Applicant to provide for a copy of this order to the authorities when entering the test centre.

However, the Court did not agree with the Applicant’s prayer for a general order due to the paucity of time. The Court noted that the Consortium needed time to make proper arrangements.

Court’s Order

A bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice R Subhash Reddy & Justice MR Shah passed this order allowing the Applicant to sit for the examination.

The Bench noted that the Applicant should be allowed to take the CLAT examination in a separate isolation room provided by the Centre Superintendent. Further, the Court ordered the Applicant to ensure that a downloaded copy of this Order is presented before the Centre Superintendent as early as possible by any other non-symptomatic person.

The Court ordered the Applicant to enter the centre after all other examinees and to leave before all other examinees. Lastly, the Court granted permission to the Centre Superintendent to call for medical assistance, if any was required.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -