SC Says Compensation Under Loss of Consortium Not Limited to Wife, Extends to Parents and Children

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

The Supreme Court partly allowed appeals by three Insurance companies against the award of compensation by MACT. The Court held that the awarding of compensation under the loss of consortium and loss of love and affection is not correct.

Brief Facts of the Case

This judgment is the consolidation of Civil Appeals arising out of orders of various High Courts. These are about compensation awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act of 1988. The appeals had a common question of law and hence were heard together before the Supreme Court.

Three Insurance Companies have filed the appeals – 

  • New India Assurance Company Limited, 
  • Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Limited
  • Oriental Insurance Company. 

These appeals question the orders of the High Courts arising out of the award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). They concern compensation awarded in favour of the claimants under two heads -loss of consortium and loss of love and affection. Additionally, about the consortium, the question arises whether only to the wife is entitled to it or it can be also awarded to the children and parents. 

Arguments by Appellants

The Learned Counsel for the appellants referred to the 2017 decision of the Supreme Court in National Insurance Ltd v Pranay Sethi & Ors. This judgment laid down three conventional heads – loss of estate, loss of consortium, and funeral expenses and also fixed an amount to each head. The total amounted to Rs. 70000 as the upper limit.

Further, the amount granted under the head loss of love and affection is without jurisdiction. Plus, the amount granted under the head ‘consortium’ could not be more than ₹40,000, and the amount of consortium is only payable to the wife, who is entitled to ₹40,000. The Tribunals and the High Courts committed error in awarding the amount of consortium to each of the claimants, i.e., wife, children, and parents.

Further, the High Court should not have awarded compensation under the head loss of love and affection and loss of consortium to each of the claimants. It is contrary to the law laid down by this Court and has to be set aside.

In the appeal filed by Oriental Insurance Company Limited, learned counsel submits that although MACT erred in allowing the consortium to four claimants at the rate of ₹40,000, the High Court in the appeal further enhanced the compensation under the head ‘loss of love and affection’. This could not have been done since the appeal wasn’t by the claimants.

Arguments by Claimants

The Learned Counsel refuted the claims of the appellants. They claimed that the award to each of the claimants at the rate of ₹40000 under the head consortium is as per the law laid down by this Court. Further, it was argued that in this context the term consortium cannot be given a narrow interpretation and the amount was given to the wife and also to the parents and children. 

Court’s Observation

First, the Court observed that compensation is a comprehensive term that includes a claim for the damages. Under s. 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 a claimant is entitled to compensation which has to be fair and fair. The loss of life and limb can never be compensated but, this provision is a social piece of legislation with the intent of facilitating the redress for the loss and compensate to a reasonable extent.

Many cases like Sarla Verma v Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr, General Manager Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v Susamma Thomas & Ors, United India Insurance Company Limited v Satinder Kaur, etc.

The Court observed that in the United India case a comprehensive interpretation has been given to the expression consortium. It includes spousal, parental as well as a filial consortium. But, the loss of love and affection is comprehended under the loss of consortium. It cannot be awarded. In the remove case, the Court has also held that consortium is not limited to a spousal consortium. It extends to a parental and a filial consortium. 

Further, the Court opined that Pranay Sethi judgment cannot be read to mean that it lays down that the consortium is payable only to the wife. Also, the United India Insurance case has laid down that all three categories of the consortium are payable.

On the submission specific to Oriental Insurance, the Court said that the High Court had erred in awarding compensation towards loss of love and affection, and they set aside Paragraph 9 of the impugned order.

Court’s Order

The Court allowed the appeals. The bench stated that the impugned judgments awarding consortium to each claimant under the law do not warrant an appeal. It is allowed insofar as the award of compensation under the head of loss of love and affection. The MACT is directed to recomputed the amount payable and take steps.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -