SC Rejects PIL Last Week Seeking Homeopathic Treatment for Coronavirus

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Two homeopathic physicians filed a PIL seeking directions to the Ministry of AYUSH to permit the treatment of mild coronavirus through homeopathic medicines. A three-judge SC bench dismissed the same.

Petitioner’s Submissions

The Petitioners are two homeopathic doctors named Dr Ravi M. Nair and Dr Asok Kumar Das. This prayer concerns the treatment of COVID-19 cases. They are represented by Advocate Suvidutt MS.

In their submissions to the Court, they have cited their observational research to claim that certain homeopathic medicines help prevent and combat the virus. They express that despite their solution, the authorities have not been approving clinical trials for the same.

They allege that this could be a violation of Article 21 as the authorities are stagnating and holding up a possible discovery that might save millions of lives.

They claim that homeopathy has ample potential to treat the contagious virus. They also mentioned certain advantages of the same. They are:

  • Early recovery of the patient which reduces the chance of spreading the virus.
  • It controls the progress of the diseases and thus limits further damage and complications. This might reduce the need for institutional care i.e. ventilators, etc.
  • Contrary to the costly RT-PCR test, this system of treatment requires cheaper laboratory investigations.
  • These medications are cheap and safe and hence more affordable to the general public. The availability of physicians is another factor to be considered.
  • There is a limited number of allopathic hospitals; but, a much larger number of homeopathic physicians are available, even in remote places.

Petitioner’s Prayers

Based on their research, the petitioners pray to the Court to issue directions or orders to the Ministry of AYUSH to approve homeopathic treatment. They pray to the Court to ask the Central Government to use only homeopathic medicine to treat mild cases of COVID-19. They suggest that allopathic medicines should be used only for severe to critical cases to integrated with homeopathic medicine and add-on therapy.

Court’s Decision

The three-judge bench comprised of CJI S.A. Bobde, Justice AS Bopanna, and Justice V. Ramasubramanian. They decided to dismiss this plea but; the petitioners have the liberty to approach the Delhi High Court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -