SC Reiterates Law on Misconception of Fact Arising Out of Promise To Marry and Examination of Accused

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

On September 28th 2020, a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court acquitted a rape Accused-Appellant in the case of Maheshwar Tigga v The State of Jharkhand. The court observed that misconception of fact arising out of a promise to marry has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over a long period coupled with a conscious positive action not to protest.

Background 

The Trial Court convicted the appellant and held that the Prosecutrix was fourteen years of age when the Appellant had first committed rape upon her at the point of a knife. He did not abide by his promise to marry her. Moreover, the High Court dismissed the appeal. It opined that the letters were written by the appellant to the prosecutrix, their photographs together, and the statement of the appellant recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was sufficient to sustain the conviction. Hence, the Appellant assailed his conviction before the Supreme Court. 

Appellant’s Contentions

The Appellant’s Counsel submitted that the physical relations between the Appellant and the Prosecutrix were consensual. Moreover, the questions put to the Appellant under Section 313 Cr.P.C. were very casual and perfunctory. It led to the denial of proper opportunity of defence causing serious prejudice to him. It denied him right to a fair trial. The marriage between them could not materialise due to societal reasons as the Appellant belonged to the Scheduled Tribe, while the prosecutrix was a Christian.

State’s Contentions 

The Counsel for the State submitted that the defence of a consensual relationship is irrelevant considering that the Prosecutrix was fourteen years of age. The appellant had held out a false promise of marriage only to establish physical relations with the Prosecutrix. He obtained the consent of the appellant by a false misrepresentation, which is no consent in the eyes of the law.

Court’s Observations

The three-judge Bench comprising Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, Navin Sinha and Indira Banerjee heard the matter. The Bench made several observations concerning the issues at hand.

Firstly, the Court observed that there is a wide variation in the evidence about the age of the Prosecutrix. In the absence of positive evidence being led by the prosecution concerning the age of the Prosecutrix on the date of occurrence, the possibility of her being above the age of eighteen years on the date cannot be ruled out. 

The Bench then proceeded to the issue with respect to the examination of the Accused. A bare perusal of the examination of the accused under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. reveals it to be extremely casual and perfunctory. The Court held that, in terms of criminal trials, there is great importance pertaining to the questions put forth to the Accused. 

This is due to the fact that it would provide the Accused with the opportunity not only to furnish his defence but also to explain the incriminating circumstances against him. Thus, the Bench went on to emphasise the importance of putting all relevant questions to an accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C

The Bench further observed that as per Section 90 of the Indian Penal Code, consent given under a misconception of fact is no consent in the eyes of law. However, this misconception of fact has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over years.  

The Bench observed that the Consent given by the Appellant was a conscious and informed choice made by her after due deliberation, it is spread over a long period coupled with a conscious positive action not to protest. 

Court’s Decision 

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court allowed the appeal. In doing so, The Bench observed the conviction to be “Unsustainable”. Thus, the conviction of the Appellant was set aside. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -