SC Refuses to Transfer Money From PM Cares to National Disaster Relief Fund

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

The Full Bench comprised of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice R. Subhash Reddy and Justice M.R Shah, that held that there is no prohibition on any contribution to the NDRF. Also, the two funds are different, hence a transfer of money from one to the other is not possible.

Brief facts of the case

The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (“the Act”) was enacted to bring requisite institutional mechanisms for drawing up and monitoring the implementation of the Disaster Management Plans. It was also aimed at providing measures for preventing and mitigating the effects of disasters.

This Public Interest Litigation has been filed in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. It seeks to direct the government to install a National Plan under Section 11 read with Section 10 of the Act. This is to deal with the current pandemic (Covid-19) and to lay standard measures of relief to persons affected with COVID-19. 

It also seeks permission to use the National Disaster Response Fund (“NDRF”) to assist in the fight against COVID-19. And to credit, all the contributions or grants received in NDRF instead of PM CARES Fund. Additionally, all funds collected in PM CARES Fund to date should be directed to be transferred to NDRF.

Petitioners’ Arguments

National Plan under Section 11 of the Act has been framed in November 2019. But the said Plan is neither comprehensive nor covers the management of pandemic, i.e., COVID-19.

Moreover, all the contributions made by the individuals and institutions about COVID-19 are being credited into the PM CARES Fund and not in NDRF. This is a clear violation of Section 46 of the Act, 2005. Also, the NDRF is subject to CAG Audit and PM CARES Fund is not subject to CAG Audit.

Respondent’s Arguments

The Act provides for a broad framework of the response to be provided in pursuance to a National Plan in case of any disaster. That National Plan is not a document that contains the microscopic details on the day to day management of the issues arising out of different disasters.

Court’s View

The court opined that there was no need for a fresh National Disaster Management Plan, for COVID-19. COVID-19 being a Biological and Public Health Emergency, it has been covered by National Plan, 2019. This is supplemented by various plans, guidelines, and measures. That said, there is no lack or dearth of plans and procedures to deal with COVID-19. All aspects of the epidemics, all measures to contain an epidemic, preparedness, response, mitigation have been dealt in the Plan, 2019.

Section 12 of the Act already provides for guidelines for relief measures in place, even before COVID-19. There is no need for further small reliefs in the wake of COVID-19.

The Court stated that the PM CARES Fund has been constituted as a “public charitable trust”. After the outbreak of pandemic COVID-19, the need of having a dedicated national fund with the aim of dealing with any kind of emergency or distress situation, like posed by the COVID-19. The PM CARES Fund consists of voluntary contributions and does not get any budgetary support. And no government money is credited in the PM CARES Fund.

The Court stated that the nature of NDRF and PM CARES Fund is different. The guidelines issued under the Act for NDRF provides for its audit by the CAG of India. But for public charitable trust (PM CARES) there is no occasion for audit by the CAG.

Court’s Decision

The Court said that there is no occasion nor need for issuing any direction to transfer the funds in the PM CARES to the NDRF.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -