SC: Private Unaided Minority Institutions to Seek Recall of HC Order Regulation Fees

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition. Private unaided minority educational institutions filed this challenging a Calcutta High Court order. The order was restricting them from stopping students from answering examinations for not paying fees.

Brief facts of the case

The impugned order is the 18.08.2020 order of the Calcutta High Court which arose out of several writ petitions filed by the parents. Over 15,000 students were debarred from appearing for the online 1examination on account of non-payment of fees. This Writ was filed against over 110 private and unaided schools across the city.

The Calcutta High Court had ruled in their favour and prohibited the schools from placing such restrictions.

In this SLP, private unaided minority institutions challenge the same.

Arguments

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, Advocate Rohit Amit Sthalekar, and Advocate Sankalp Narain represented the petitioner schools. They stated that the order infringes their right under Article 30(1). The Article confers the fundamental right to administer educational institutions of their choice.

They cited the 2016 case of Committee of Management, La Martiniere College, Lucknow v Vatsal Gupta & Ors. They referred to the Court’s observation that a writ petition is not maintainable against institutions that are a private unaided minority. 

Also, they referred to the direction that orders them to submit the audited books of accounts which shows the income/expenditure statements of the school. They argued that this direction causes the petitioners’ Minority rights are grave hardship and prejudice.

Further, they referred to the judgment in TM Pai v State (2002). It stated that when the matter relates to fees, the interference of the State should be the least. The State should abstain from such matters unless it discloses profiteering capitation fees. 

Court’s Observation

The Court observed that these special leave petitions do not call for any interference by them. Also, they granted the petitioners liberty to apply to the High Court concerned and pray for recall or modification of the same.

Also, they stated that until any decision is taken on this matter by the High Court on such an application, the order will not be given effect to. It will be kept in abeyance. 

Court’s Order

The bench comprised of Justice Ashok Bhushan, Justice R. Subhash Reddy, and Justice MR Shah. They disposed of this appeal and directed the petitioners to approach the High Court and seek recall of the impugned order.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -