SC: Pasting Poster Outside Residence of COVID-19 Not Required

Must Read

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Follow us

The case concerns the practice of affixing posters outside the houses of Covid-19 patients and the righteousness of such practice.

Brief Facts of the Case

This writ petition had been filed under Article 32 of the Constitution as Public Interest Litigation. The relief sought through writ petition is quashing the decision to affix posters outside residences of Covid-19 positive persons under home isolation and put an end to this practice. Further, directions to be issued to officials and authorities to not disclose the names of Covid-19 positive persons to any person or resident welfare associations/neighborhood welfare groups/ apartment block groups, etc. During the pendency of the petition as well names of Covid-19 should not be circulated in any Whatsapp group. 

Appellant’s Argument

The practice of affixing the posters amounts to a violation of the right to privacy guaranteed under Article 21 of the constitution. The circulation of names in the public forums of Covid-19 positive persons and they are having to live in their homes affixed with posters are the most inhuman and indignifying experience. The dignity of the person lies in the ability to live with respect in society. However, by affixing the posters and circulating the manes, the life of an individual comes under public scrutiny which destroys the ethos of one’s dignity. 

Covid-19 positive persons cannot be criticized for merely contracting an illness and their illness cannot be the ground for discrimination and differential treatment. Article 14 of the Constitution is based on this principle and the Constitution will never permit discrimination on the ground of illness and physical suffering. 

Covid-19 is a distressing experience with its malefic effects, both physically and mentally, which is further aggravated by restrictions by the state in the form of isolation which leads to the curtailment of rights under Article 19. By affixing posters and circulating names, the state cannot be allowed to violate Article 21 as well. 

This practice has no proof of serving any purpose and instead it turned out to be counterproductive. To avoid drawing attention in testing positive, the person began to deliberately avoid testing themselves to protect themselves from public embarrassment and stigmatization. 

The Delhi High Court, in a similar case, held that posters should not be affixed and that are already in place should be removed. 

Respondent’s Argument

It was submitted that guidelines issued by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare for home isolation, nowhere mention about pasting of posters outside the residence of Covid-19 positive persons. Referring to guidelines dated 02.07.2020 on the subject. 

Further, the Department of Family Welfare issued a letter to Additional Chief Secretaries/ Principal Secretaries/ Secretaries(Health) all States/UTs that Government of India guidelines does not contain any directions regarding affixing posters or other signage outside the residence of Covid-19 positive persons. 

Observation of the Court

The guidelines dated 02.07.2020 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare does not contain any guidelines regarding pasting of posters rather Ministry of Health and Family welfare issued a letter dated 19.11.2020, guidelines are reiterated as guidance for states and Union Territories following this practice. 

The Union of India had neither issued such directions of pasting posters nor it is obligatory for the states or UTs to paste posters outside the residence of Covid-19 positive persons. The State of Punjab and NCT of Delhi issued directions to affix the posters but the said orders were withdrawn and now no posters are being pasted on the houses of Covid-19 positive persons. 

The various submissions made by the petitioner need no consideration because the guidelines issued by the Health Ministry which are referable to the exercise of power by the authority under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, do not contain any requirement of pasting posters against houses of COVID-19 patients. 

The State government and Union Territories can resort to the above exercises only when directions are issued by the competent authority under Disaster Management Act, 2005. 

The Decision of the Court

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click here to read the judgment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -