SC Directs Diwan to Nominate Four Members of the Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan

Must Read

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Follow us

The Supreme Court passed the judgment related to the interpretation of the provisions of Section 6(1)(viii) of the Nanded Act 1956 in the matter of Sadar Bahginder Singh v. Sadar Manjieeth Singh.

Brief Facts of the Case

On 28th December 1951, the Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwas Association Society (Diwan) was registered under the Hyderabad Societies Registration Act.

On 11th January 1982, the certificate of registration was issued to the aforesaid trust. The Certificate became the origin of the dispute between the conflicting parties. On 22nd January 2014, the 2 Judge Bench of the Supreme Court set aside the matter stating that the conflict is in the membership. The controversy in the case stands in the nomination of the 4 members with regard to Section 6(1)(viii) of the Nanded Act, 1956.

Due to the conflicting allegations between the parties related to the nomination, the matter came before the High Court challenging the validity of the notification which nominated the 4 members to the board u/s 6(1)(viii). The High Court held that as per section 6, the government doesn’t have the power to nominate the member of the Diwan, who would represent the statutory government except the Diwan himself.

Arguments Before the Court

The appellant had challenged the appointment of members which was done by the government, on the ground that the first respondent was not the trustee of the Diwan as he was removed from the said post by the working committee. It was contended that the High Court did not give any clear justification with regard to prohibit the notification of the Government accepting the nomination of 4 members u/s 6(1)(viii).

The respondent submitted that as per section 2(18) of the MTP Act the first respondent is still a trustee and had the locus standi to move a petition before the High Court under art. 226 of the Constitution of India. The contesting respondents had challenged the plea of the appellants about the management of the trust.

Court’s Observation

The court observed that the conflicting claims between both the parties also included the alleged removal of the first respondent from the post of trustee of the Diwan. The court said the question lay with the interpretation of Section 6(1)(viii). Section 6(1)(viii) clearly states that the power to nominate the four members is vested in Diwan and not with the State government.

Court’s Decision

The court held that in order to nominate four members of the Sachkhand Hazuri Khalsa Diwan, Nanded, section 6(1)(viii) of the Act, it gives the authority to the collective body of members of the Diwan who are entitled to select those four members to be nominated to the statutory Board. The court also stated that the process must be completed within three months from the date of this judgment. Moreover, all the appeals were disposed of by the court. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgement from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

“Rape Victim To Be Provided Shelter Due To Media Attention Prohibited Under Section 228A of the IPC”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the petition by a rape victim for rehabilitation as she was social ostracization.  Brief facts of the case In this case, a writ...

Benefit of Probation Not Excluded by the Provisions of Mandatory Minimum Sentence Under Section 397 of Ipc

This case concerns the dispute regarding the granting of probation on good conduct to the accused under the age of twenty-one years.   Brief facts of...

Supreme Court Asks for the Centre’s Response on PIL Filed Seeking the Formation of a Media Tribunal

The Supreme Court sought responses from the Press Council of India (PCI), News Broadcasters Association (NBA) on a PIL which sought to set up a media tribunal to tackle issues concerning the media like complaints against media, channels, and networks. Media has become like an unruly horse that has to be tamed to express the plea.

Law Student Asked the Supreme Court To Take Suo Moto Cognizance of the Violent Farmer Protests

A law student of Mumbai University, Ashish Rai has asked the Supreme Court to take Suo Moto Cognizance of the insult to the national flag done by the farmer protests at the Red Fort. In the course of the farmer's tractor rally on Tuesday, some of the protesters unfurled their own flags by entering the premises of the Red Fort.

Farmers Meeting With the Supreme Court Committee Postponed To Jan 29 Due To the Traffic Restrictions

Due to the traffic restrictions after the violent protests broke out on Republic Day, the meeting of farmers with the Supreme Court Committee that was supposed to take place today was postponed to 29th January.

Supreme Court Stays Bombay HC Judgment which said Groping without Skin Contact Not Sexual Assault under POCSO

The National Commission for Women (NCW) has challenged the Bombay High Court judgment where it stated that groping a child’s breasts without any ‘skin-to-skin’ contact will not be considered as sexual assault as defined under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Supreme Court Classifying Employees Based on Educational Qualifications for Promotion or Appointment Is Neither Violative of Article 14 nor of Article 16

This case concerns the dispute relating to the classification of employees belonging to the homogenous group based on educational qualifications. Brief facts of the case The...

Supreme Court Refuses To Transfer Petitions To Itself Related To ‘Love Jihad’ Filed in Allahabad High Court

On Monday, the Supreme Court refused to entertain the plea which was filed by the UP Government regarding the transfer of all the pleas challenging the ordinance the court passed, from Allahabad High Court to the Supreme Court.

Bombay HC Nagpur Bench Holds That Groping a Girl Without ‘Skin To Skin’ Contact Is Not Sexual Assault

The Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court acquitted a man charged under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO) and convicted him of a minor offence under IPC stating that there was no direct physical contact.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -