SC Directs Centre to Formulate a Public Health Plan Focusing on Marginalised Sections

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On September 31st, the Supreme Court directed the Centre to convene a meeting comprising States and UTs to address commercialisation of health care in the wake of COVID19. The advice given to the Centre was to come up with a legislative and executive master plan focusing on marginalised sections of society. The Centre is to come up with the said plan within two weeks of the meeting. 

Background

The Petitioner, Sachin Jain, is an advocate practising in the SC. He Petitioned for directing the Union of India to: 

a) Regulate the cost of treatment of patients infected with COVID­19 at Private/Corporate hospitals. 

b) Bear the cost of treatment of COVID­19 patients at private hospitals, for the poor and vulnerable and who have neither the means nor the insurance cover. 

c) Combat the commercialisation of health care by the private health sector as the Government has given them unfettered powers to charge without a cap.

Court’s Observation

SC emphasised that public health is a State matter. It pointed out that only a few states have taken the initiative to pass legislation on the model prepared by the Government of India under the caption “Model Public Health Act”. 

Moreover, the high ideals and several sections of the National Health Bill, 2009 were specifically pointed out that recognise (i) the right to health, and (ii) the right to access, use and enjoy all facilities necessary for ensuring the right to health (iii) emergency treatment and care, irrespective of the inability to pay the requisite fee or charges. 

The States despite having the legislative competence, have failed to act on the said Model Act and Health Bill. The Centre is unable to act, for want of competence. But the Central Government has the power under Section 62 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, to issue certain directions. 

Court’s Decision

A bench comprising Chief Justice SA Bobde, Justices AS Bopanna & V. Ramasubramanian directed the Centre to: 

(i) Convene a meeting of the Health Ministers/Secretaries of all States and Union Territories within one week from the order;

(ii) Devise a legislative and executive master plan in the said meeting, based on the existing Public Health Acts of various States and the National Health Bill, 2009, which focuses on the marginalized sections of society within 2 weeks of the first meeting. 

(iii) Convene a second meeting of the Health Ministers/Secretaries of all States and UTs to collate the information received regarding the steps taken by them. 

(iv) File a comprehensive report with a compilation of the information received.

(v) The States with existing Public Health Acts were thereby further advised to fine tune their existing enactments on the National Health Bill, 2009. 

All the State Governments and Union Territories were suo moto impleaded as parties to the Writ Petition. Further, the Court issued a notice to them. The matter is further listed for hearing after four weeks.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -