SC Directed the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation to Pay the Pension to Absorbed Employees

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

The payment of pension to the surplus employees who are absorbed into another public enterprise is generally governed by the regulations and the circulars issued by the State Government concerned. This case examines one such situation of pension payable to surplus employees absorbed into the appellant’s corporation.

Brief Facts of the Case

The Rajasthan State Agro Industries Corporation Limited (“RSAICL”) was closed by the State Government and all its employees were declared surplus. In order to accommodate the surplus employees, the State Government issued a notification for the absorption of the surplus employees in different corporations. Guidelines were issued for the same. The guidelines contained provisions regarding the benefits of a pension. The employees were allowed a choice between Contribution Pension Scheme or Corporation Pension Scheme. The respondent no. 1 was absorbed in the appellant’s corporation. Thereafter, as per the guidelines, the respondent no. 1 chose pension under Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Regulations, 1989 (“Regulations”). However, under his previous employment, the respondent no. 1 received a pension under the CPF Scheme. The respondent no. 1 made a request for the transfer of the fund to the General Provident Fund.

A circular was issued by the appellant. It was noted that only when the appellant receives a capital amount from the Rajasthan State Argo Industries Corporation, that the employees of the appellant would be entitled to the benefit chosen. The amount was transferred, and respondent No. 1 made several representations regarding the approval of the pension. The respondent no. 1 superannuated. Thereafter, a Writ Petition was filed seeking recognition of the choice and extending benefits. The Writ Petition was allowed and hence the present appeal.

Appellant’s Arguments

It was contended that the capital amount from both the CPF account and pension fund in the proportion of employees and the organization’s contribution. The respondent took the benefits of retirement from the RSAICL and is getting a pension from the Employees Provident Fund Organization. Hence, the respondent cannot avail additional benefits from the appellant. Additionally, the condition of transfer under para 11(b) was not fulfilled. Therefore, the respondent was not entitled to the benefit.

Respondent’s Arguments

Per contra, the respondent submitted that the entire contributions of the respondent were transferred by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, thereby fulfilling the condition. Furthermore, the respondent exercised his option of Pension benefit as prescribed. Hence, the decisions of the Rajasthan High Court in Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Mahaveer Prasad Jain be applied.

Court’s View

The Court referenced the statutory provisions of the Road Transportation Act, 1950 under which the Regulations are formulated. Therein the Court referred to definitions of ‘option’, ‘existing employee’. The Court referred the Regulation 43 of the Regulations which stipulates about the transfer to the pension fund by the Corporation. The Circular issued by the Bureau of Public Enterprises for absorption was brought on record and Clause 11(b) was referred. The Clause required the transfer of the CPF Account of the surplus employees to the absorbing enterprise.

The Court observed that clause 11(b) categorically applied to the present case. The respondent in his earlier employment was governed by the CPF Scheme, whereby contributions of both the employer and the employee were made. The amounts contributed by both were transferred to the appellant’s corporation post the absorption.

The Court observed that there was no obligation for transfer of the capital amount, but only transfer of the contributed sum, in the Regulations or the Circular. The only requirement was the transfer of the Employee’s contribution to the GPF Account. Therefore, nothing else was to be done by the employer for fulfilling the conditions with regard to the respondent’s claim of pension.

The Court referred the decision of the Rajasthan High Court in Jaipur Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. and Anr. v. Mahaveer Prasad Jain, 2008 (2) WLN 337. Therein the facts of the case are similar to the present case and the court observed that clause 11(b) was referred. It was held that the rejection of the claims of the petitioner therein was not legally sound.

Court’s Decision

The Court partly allowed the Appeal. The Court recognized the order made by the Hon’ble High Court to refund the entire amount under the CPF Scheme. In order to balance equities, the Court directed the Corporation to pay the pension to the respondents from the date of deposit made by them.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -