SC Asks Jharkhand Government to Find Possibility of Entry in Religious Places During COVID-19

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

A Special Leave Petition was filed in the Supreme Court. This was against an order of Jharkhand High Court prohibiting the participation of devotees in Shravani Puja in Deoghar district. The judges modified the impugned order and left the state to pass necessary orders.

Brief Facts of the case

The application prays for entry into the Baidhyanath Jyotirlinga Temple and Bana Basukinath Temple during the Shravan month. The Jharkhand High Court allowed only online darshan during Shravan. Further, the Court ordered that the Puja of Jyotirlinga would continue without any public participation.

A prayer was made to the HC requesting permission to a limited number of devotees to take part in the puja. The Court but deemed it inappropriate. It would amount to a deprivation of the right of those not participating. A prayer also requested permission for the participation of those residing in the Deoghar district but was declined. The Court stated that those people receive differential treatment when it comes to religious faith.

Arguments of the Parties

The petitioner bought to the attention of the Court how while religious functions are prohibited, marriages and public transport is allowed maintaining social distancing norm. Even gatherings of 50 people are allowed. Hence, such restrictions on puja are unwarranted.

The respondent submitted the directions passed by the Home Ministry that extending the lockdown till 31.8.2020. But, the petitioner argued that 20,000-30,000 pandas have been allowed entry in the Baidhyanath Temple; yet, no public is allowed in the premises. A video verified the same.

Court’s Observation

The Court stated that the total restriction placed by the High Court on darshan by the public is prima facie unreasonable. The argument showing the presence of a large number of pandas on the premise of the temple alarmed them. It might not be an ideal situation to prevent the spread of Coronavirus.

The Court asked the authorities to regulated this. Only limited persons must be allowed while maintaining social distancing norms. The state has to make sure that there are no large congregation, even of pandas. Further, the Court held that the High Court was wrong in restricting entry in the temple in the months of Bhado and Sharvan. The High Court should have let the state decide. If the government can make social distancing norms and proper arrangements, it should not be stopped.

Moreover, the Court noticed that other states have opened religious places around the country maintaining social distancing norms. The state must enforce such norms when places are opening throughout India. They need to put in the effort to try and make some arrangements so that the general public can avail of the places of worship.

Court’s Order

The Court disposed of the SLP. It modified the order of the High Court that imposed blanket restrictions on the entry to the temple. They requested the state to see if the limited entry of the devotees can take place. This request extends beyond the temples in question. It includes an entry in all such places of worship around the state.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -