SC Allows NLAT, Says Results and Admission Subject to Final Decision of the Court

Must Read

High Court of Gauhati Hears PIL for Non-Implementation of Funds for Various Schemes in Nagaland

Introduction A PIL filed by the Global Trust Club raising the issue concerned with the non-implementation of schemes such as...

Public Money Recovery Cannot Wait in Perpetuity To Suit Convenience of Particular Borrower: Calcutta High Court

Excerpt The Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court on 22nd January 2021, ruled that the recovery...

Supreme Court Refuses To Provide Protection From Arrest To ‘Tandav’ Team

The Supreme Court did not give any relief to actors and the makers of Tandav, an Amazon Prime Video Web Series who appealed for protection against their arrest. At least three cases have been filed in Uttar Pradesh against the makers of the series for the inappropriate depiction of the UP police, deities, and adverse portrayal of the character of PM. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bihar, Delhi, and Chandigarh also have similar cases filed.

Transferring Employee Without Justification To Another Place Where Post Does Not Exist Is Illegal and Arbitrary; Should Be Set Aside: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy gave orders on the writ petition filed by the...

Supreme Court Extends Protection To CM Yediyurappa Against Arrest in a Corruption Case

The Supreme Court on Monday protected the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the former minister of industries Murugesh Nirani from the arrest pertaining to a case of alleged forgery over the withdrawal of approval given to a piece of land.

Centre’s Resistance To Draft EIA in All Vernacular Languages Questioned by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it cannot understand why the Centre is refusing from translating the Environment Impact Act (EIA) into all 22 vernacular languages mentioned in the eighth schedule of the Constitution.

Follow us

Supreme Court on 11th September heard a plea filed by former NLSIU VC challenging the NLAT exam scheduled the next day. The Court decided to allow the test to be held as scheduled. 

Brief Facts of the Case

National Law School India University (NLSIU), a premier law school of the country, on 3rd September announced that it has decided to withdraw from admitting students via the Common Law Admission Test for the academic year 2021. Instead, they would be holding a separate law entrance test, National Law Admission Test (NLAT) on September 12th through online mode at home. 

Various High Courts received pleas challenging this decision of NLSIU. They stated that this decision amounted to fundamental rights violations of the candidates. 

This specific Plea had been filed by Former Vice-Chancellor of NLSIU, Prof (Dr) R. Venkata Rao with an aggrieved parent of a CLAT aspirant. 

The Petitioners prayed that the September 3rd decision of NLSIU should be quashed. They asked for the Court to direct schools to admit students based on their CLAT scores. The University had taken this step while completely ignoring the aspirations of poor, marginalized, and less privileged aspirants. 

Arguments by Petitioner

The Plea was filed by Advocate Sugosh Subramyam and Advocate Vipin Nair. They submitted that this unilateral decision of the University threw the aspirants into a frenzy. It violated their fundamental rights under Article 14 and Article 21.

Further, the Petitioners contend that this action is nothing but an attempt to create an elitist institution. It is limiting the institution to only those who can afford to take the test and follow other conditions imposed by the University.

The Plea stated that this is an attempt to turn this Island of Excellence into the Island of Exclusion.

The Petitioners submitted that this move by NLSIU to conduct a separate entrance violates the bylaws of the Consortium. Also, the examination standard is something that is decided by the Academic Council and the Executive Council. That isn’t subject to amendment or repeal.

The Senior Advocate Nidheesh Gupta explained the Memorandum of Association of the NLU Consortium to the Bench. He showed that any NLU that is a part of the Consortium is required to organize CLAT for admission across all law courses. Additionally, the decision to postpone CLAT was taken given the situation in West Bengal and Bihar which NLSIU was a part of.

Arguments by the Respondents 

Senior Advocate Arvind Datar requested to present his argument as the exam was to be held the next day. NLSIU is the only law school having a trimester system and had appealed to the Consortium not to delay this exam beyond September.

This delay in admission is resulting in a loss of 16 crores for the University. He added that NLAT was only for the current year, and they will return to CLAT from the following year. 

Court’s Observation 

The Bench observed that the issue at hand is of most importance. The Respondent’s Counsel Senior Advocate Arvind Datar should file a counter-affidavit. Further, the Bench observed that the Respondents could be allowed to conduct the exam since they had already decided on it. Even the students are willing to take the exam. However, the result and the following admission process will be on hold.

Court’s Order 

The Bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan ordered that the Respondent University will go ahead with the exam on the following day. However, the results and admissions will be subject to the decision of this Court. The parties were directed to file the counter-affidavits within three days. 

The matter was posted for the next hearing on 16th September.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

High Court of Gauhati Hears PIL for Non-Implementation of Funds for Various Schemes in Nagaland

Introduction A PIL filed by the Global Trust Club raising the issue concerned with the non-implementation of schemes such as Swachh Bharat Mission in Nagaland...

Public Money Recovery Cannot Wait in Perpetuity To Suit Convenience of Particular Borrower: Calcutta High Court

Excerpt The Bench of Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of the Calcutta High Court on 22nd January 2021, ruled that the recovery of public money cannot wait...

Supreme Court Refuses To Provide Protection From Arrest To ‘Tandav’ Team

The Supreme Court did not give any relief to actors and the makers of Tandav, an Amazon Prime Video Web Series who appealed for protection against their arrest. At least three cases have been filed in Uttar Pradesh against the makers of the series for the inappropriate depiction of the UP police, deities, and adverse portrayal of the character of PM. States like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Bihar, Delhi, and Chandigarh also have similar cases filed.

Transferring Employee Without Justification To Another Place Where Post Does Not Exist Is Illegal and Arbitrary; Should Be Set Aside: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge Bench consisting of Honorable Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy gave orders on the writ petition filed by the Petitioner seeking to issue a...

Supreme Court Extends Protection To CM Yediyurappa Against Arrest in a Corruption Case

The Supreme Court on Monday protected the Chief Minister of Karnataka and the former minister of industries Murugesh Nirani from the arrest pertaining to a case of alleged forgery over the withdrawal of approval given to a piece of land.

Centre’s Resistance To Draft EIA in All Vernacular Languages Questioned by the Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court said that it cannot understand why the Centre is refusing from translating the Environment Impact Act (EIA) into all 22 vernacular languages mentioned in the eighth schedule of the Constitution.

Section 125 of CrPC Was Enacted To Achieve Social Justice for Women, Child and Infirm Parents: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court, while terming the statutory mandate for a financially capable man to maintain his wife, children and parents, a social legislature, it said that the proceeding under it is of a summary nature and is aimed at providing quick relief to the person in dire need.

Federal Court Rules That 1992 Term Limit Amendments To Michigan Constitution Were Lawful

Excerpt The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan last Wednesday ruled in favour of the Offices of the Secretary of State for...

Maryland’s County Circuit Court Sentences Sean Urbanski To Life in Prison for Murder of 2Lt. Richard Collins III

Excerpt On the 14th of January 2021, Prince George’s County Circuit Court in Maryland (US) sentenced Sean C. Urbanski to life in prison with the...

“Dismissal Without Inquiry Is Justified if Employee Did Not Prove Minimum Working Period”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the dispute relating to the termination of an employee without any disciplinary inquiry. Brief facts of the case The Respondent, Smt. Sureshwati was...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -