PIL Before SC to Declare No Freedom of Speech & Expression in Court Proceedings

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

A PIL was filed by an advocate Dr Subhash Vijayran before the SC to declare that no freedom of speech and expression on court proceedings and judgments except to the extent of true and fair reporting.

Brief facts of the case

When a Division Bench of Rajasthan HC, ordered to extend the status quo on Speaker’s Disqualification Notices regarding the Rajasthan political crisis. On 25.07.2020, Congress leader and Senior Advocate, Mr P. Chidambaram tweets which allegedly imputing motives and bias on the judges, concerning Rajasthan political crisis and pending adjudication before the HC and SC.

The petitioner approached the SC with the aforesaid issue and prays to declare that there is no freedom of speech and expression concerning the pending matters and final verdicts before the courts. The exception being the extent of fair and true reporting of the court’s proceedings, in a manner that does not directly/indirectly impute motives/ bias on the judges.

Arguments of the petitioner

The petitioner submitted that “apparently innocuous” tweets impute that the judges of the SC and the HC hearing the matter are puppets of the Central Government and pass orders in its favour. He stated that this imputation can be seen in replies of the above mentioned Chidambaram’s tweet. He also submitted that by imputing motives/bias to the judges, the entire judicial system gets disgraced. And it shakes the confidence of the general public in the judiciary.

Oral Arguments by Petitioner

  • Petitioner argued that Judges are not politicians and hence cannot respond or defend themselves against various imputations. Imputations hinder the judge’s ability to think in a straight manner and ultimately hamper the administration of justice.
  • The petitioner stated that there are so many methods that can be adopted to improve our judicial system. National Judicial Accountability Commission can be set up, to entertain complaints against judges.
  • Petitioner also argued that the court should come up with an order which defines the bounds of law within which one could comment on the judiciary and report court proceedings.

Court’s Order

The Supreme Court ordered that the present matter requires time so as to decide the question of jurisdiction. The Apex Court directed the High Court not to pass any orders for which it had heard the matter. The SC had also laid down that any decision can be taken only after the court comes to a suitable conclusion regarding the present petition. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -