Notice Must Be Given Before Alteration in NRI Quota in Private Medical Institutions: Supreme Court

Must Read

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

Follow us

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that NRI quotas are not sacrosanct in medical admissions. The composition of the quota can be altered or deleted. This should happen after providing adequate notice to those students who want to join colleges through those seats. 

Brief Facts of the Case

The Single Judge Bench of the Rajasthan High Court had held that the deletion of the Non-Resident Indian (NRI) quota was contrary to law. The Appellants took post-graduate admission in the State colleges of Rajasthan in pursuant of the same. Later, a Division Bench of the High Court ruled against the Single bench decision.

Following this, the present appeal was filed.

Appellant’s Arguments 

The Counsel contended that the action to withdraw the NRI quota is arbitrary. This sudden action was after calling the students to opt for such quota and the declaration of NEET test results.

The twin objective behind the creation of this quota is defeated. First, the quota enables “cross-subsidization” of seats, for the benefit of meritorious but poor students. Second, it enables students who have been schooled abroad to immerse themselves and find their roots in Indian society.

The Division Bench decision had made the candidates give up the seats in other medical colleges, to accept NRI seats. This had been prejudiced too.

Respondent’s Arguments

The allotment of seats was to be made according to the merit of the candidates who had applied in the NRI quota. Also, the NRI quota could not apply in the facts and circumstances of the case. The institutions (private colleges) had not claimed any seats under the NRI quota, according to the seat matrices that were furnished by them in 2020.

Unaided private colleges are “entitled to autonomy in their administration” even when they are bound to make merit-based admissions.

Court’s Observation

The Bench stated that in P.A. Inamdar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (2005) 6 SCC 537, a provision for 15% NRI quota was not compulsory and that it was the only potential.

There is nothing in the judgment that states 15% NRI quota to be an unqualified and unalterable part of the admission process in post-graduate medical courses. It remains within the discretionary authority of the management of private medical colleges, within their internal policy-making domain.

The Bench opined that the Division Bench decision was correct to the extent that Single judge bench could not have directed admission of the candidates before it. Such a direction without a legal statutory duty cannot be taken. Hence, the NRI candidates could not assert a right to be admitted.

But the Bench also noted that the discretion of the private institutions should be reasonable. The directions of modification of any quota must be revised or modified within a reasonable time.

Yet, if a medical college or the state regulating authority decides to do away with a quota, reasonable notice of the decision should be given. This is to enable those aspiring to such seats to choose elsewhere on the prevailing conditions.

Court’s Decision

The private institutions are not obliged to maintain an NRI quota and can make private decisions in line with the statutes. But, such a decision must be communicated in time to the candidates applying for such seats in the quota.

Click here to read the Judgment


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -