Disputes Governed by Special Statutes Are Non-Arbitral: Supreme Court

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

This case concerned the appointment of Sole Arbitrator for the resolution of disputes concerning the lease or tenancy agreement under the Property Act. 

Brief Facts of the Case:

This petition had been filed under Sec. 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996(‘Act, 1996), seeking appointment of a sole arbitrator for resolution of disputes relating to sub-lease deed. 

The property bearing No. 154-B, Block ‘A’ Sector 63, Phase III, NOIDA, Gautam Budh Nagar, U.P., was leased by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) to the petitioner. The petitioner had sub-leased the same to the respondent under the Sub-Lease Deed dated 14.11.2018. In respect of Sub-Lease, certain disputes arose between the parties. 

As per Clause 12 of the Sub-Lease Deed, the dispute had to be resolved through arbitration, the petitioner invoked the same by issuing notice dated 11.12,2019, nominated the sole arbitrator, and sought concurrence from the respondent. The Respondent didn’t respond. The petitioner came before this Court seeking the appointment of the Arbitrator. 

Notice of this petition was ordered to the Respondent. Despite service, the respondent had not appeared and opposed the petition. 

Appellant’s Argument- 

The petitioner proposed the name of Justice (Retired) Mukul Mudgal as the Sole Arbitrator and pointed out that if the respondent did not agree, the petitioner would seek an appointment through Court. 

A perusal of Clause 12 points out that the parties have agreed to secure the appointment of arbitrator through the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. The description in various documents indicated that the petitioner is a citizen of Kenya and was habitually resident of Nairobi, Kenya. Thus, the petitioner being a national and habitual resident of Kenya, having entered into a contract and since the disputes arose under the said document, the same qualified as an ‘International Commercial Arbitration’ defined under Sec. 2(f) of the Act, 1996. In such a situation, the Supreme Court is supposed to appoint an Arbitrator under Sec.11(6) of the Act,1996. 

The tenancy in the instant case was not created nor was the leased property governed by special statute where the tenant enjoys statutory protection and as such, there is no impediment for resolving the dispute through Arbitration. Further explained in the case of Booz Allen and Hamilton Inc. v. SBI Home Finance Limited and Others (2011), were examples of non-arbitral disputes. 

Observation by the Court- 

The Supreme Court in the case of Himangni Enterprises v. Kamaljeet Singh Ahluwalia (2017), dismissed the civil suit against the tenant for eviction, filed under Sec.8 of Act, 1996, seeking reference to arbitration. In deciding this case, the Supreme Court relied on the decision in the case of Natraj Studios (P) Ltd. v. Navrang Studios (1981) and Booz Allen, in which it has been indicated that tenancy governed by special statutes is non-arbitral. Despite this, the Supreme Court upheld the order of rejecting the application under Sec.8 of Act, 1996. 

In the case of Vijay Drolia & Ors. v. Durga Trading Corporation (2019), it has been noticed that in Natraj Studios and Booz Allen references had been made to special statutes and had not stated concerning non-arbitrability of cases arising under The Property Act. 

The provisions under Sec. 114 and 114A of the TP Act, provide certain protections to the lessee or tenant before being ejected from the property. However, the same cannot be interpreted as statutory protection or a strict rule in all cases to waive the forfeiture. It is a provision enabling the exercise of equitable jurisdiction in appropriate cases as a matter of discretion. 

This position has been adverted to in the case of Namdeo Lokman Lodhi v. Narmadabai & Others (1953), where it had been observed that Sec. 114 of TP Act confers discretion on the Court, that discretion except in cases where the third party intervenes must always be exercised in favor of the tenant irrespective of its conduct. 

The disputes arising under special statutes such as the Rents Act provide for statutory protection against eviction and the Court specified in the Act alone will be conferred jurisdiction to order eviction or resolve such disputes. In proceedings under special statutes issue to be considered is not merely terms and conditions of the agreement between landlord and tenant but also other aspects such as bonafide requirement, comparative hardship, etc. The jurisdictional Court alone can advert into these aspects as a statutory requirement, thus, non-arbitral. 

However, this was not the position in matters relating to the lease or tenancy which are not governed under special statutes but the TP Act. 

The Decision of the Court- 

The petition was allowed. Justice (Retired) Mukul Mudgal, former Chief Justice Punjab, and Haryana High Court was appointed as Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes between the parties. The arbitral fee shall be payable as provided under the Fourth Schedule to Act, 1996, with no order as to costs. 

Click here to read Suresh Shah v. Hipad Technology India Private Limited.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -