Christchurch High Court: Australian White Supremacists Sentenced to Life Imprisonment Without Parole 

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...
Moshiuzzaman
Moshiuzzaman
Moshiuzzaman holds a 2:1 LL.B degree from BPP University (UK). He is currently pursuing the CFA chartership and working as an independent legal researcher at the American Society of International Law (ASIL)

Follow us

Christchurch High Court sentences Brenton Tarrant to life imprisonment without parole after having found him guilty in 51 murder charges, 40 charges of attempted murder, and one charge of committing a terrorist act.

Background

Brenton Harrison Tarrant, 29, is an Australian former fitness coach who moved to New Zealand in 2017 intending to collect weapons to carry out mass shootings targeting the Muslim community of New Zealand. A trail of evidence and interviews with his relatives have revealed that Brenton had become radicalized while travelling to Europe. It is widely reported that he had met white extremists over the internet and routinely wrote hate speech directed towards Muslims and non-white immigrants. 

On 15th March 2019, Brenton carried out a series of attacks in two Christchurch based mosques to carry out a further attack. The attack took place during Friday prayers when Brenton began to fire inside the Al Noor Mosque, which lasted about 6 minutes. While shooting the attendees, Brenton was live-streaming the entire onslaught on his social media. From there, Brenton drove to Linwood Islamic Centre, which was located some 5 kilometres away from the Al Noor Mosque. After killing several worshippers, and injuring several others, he was getting ready to drive to another mosque, reportedly the Ashburton Mosque. On his way, he was arrested by the police. In total, he had killed 51 individuals while wounding 40 others. 

Christchurch High Court

Justice Cameron Mander sitting at the Christchurch High Court on the 27th of August sentenced Brenton Tarrant to life imprisonment without parole. This is the first time that such a sentence has been delivered by a court in New Zealand. Although there are many jurisdictions where an accused convicted of mass murder will generally be given a death penalty, New Zealand since 1961, has abolished capital punishment. As such, Brenton would only serve 17 years in prison. 

Justice Mander, regarding the sentence, stated that no finite term in prison would be sufficient for the crime he has committed. Initially, at the beginning of the trial, Brenton had pleaded not guilty. But soon after he fired his lawyers and asked for the court to allow him to be represented by himself. Although the court allowed the request, they had allotted a lawyer in his defence for a legal query. 

There were fears that if Brenton was allowed to self-represent, he may, in the course of his representation, incite further hate speech encouraging further attacks in the future. However, the judge before reading out his judgment made it clear that any inaccurate publication of the court’s decision by news media outlets would serve as a contempt of court. This ruling ensures no further attack takes place as a result of Brenton’s speech.

After over a year in the trial, with the pandemic situation still in phase, the decision is welcomed by New Zealand and the global community. Just after the attack, gun laws in New Zealand were immediately reformed and military-style semi-automatic guns were bought by the State. The inhuman ordeal took the life of 51 innocent individuals while leaving 40 others injured. But the event has brought greater communal within New Zealand, particularly the Muslim community at large. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments of the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -