Delhi HC Asks Ashok Arora and SCBA If Mediation by a Retired SC Judge Acceptable

Must Read

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of...

Follow us

The Delhi High Court asked Advocate Ashok Arora, and the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA), if they were open to mediation, by a retired Supreme Court judge to settle their dispute (Ashok Arora vs SCBA).

Brief Facts

Following Arora’s call for an Emergent General Meeting, to remove Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave from the post of SCBA President, the Executive Council of SCBA had suspended Arora from the position of the Secretary, with an immediate effect. Arora subsequently moved the High Court challenging the resolution. Last month, the High Court issued notice to SCBA and the Bar Council of India (BCI). It directed them to file their written statement in three weeks. Arora had filed a defamation suit against Dave, citing “mental torture” against him, from the time he got elected as the Secretary of the SCBA. 

Contentions

“It is acceptable, provided someone decides in a couple of days”, Arora said.

He informed the Court that the tenure of the present office-bearers comes to an end by December 10. Arora sought an interim stay on his ouster. He contended that his removal was void ab initio, as it was in violation of Rule 35 of the SCBA Rules. He pointed out that as per Rule 35, the power to suspend or expel a member was with the General House of the Association. The same gets determined after a commission held an inquiry into a misconduct case. The Executive Committee, as in the present case, had no power to suspend or expel a member, he stated.

Arora further argued that “All principles of natural justice were thrown to the wind” as the resolution on his removal got passed under the signatures of the “interested parties”, such as the Joint Secretary, Treasurer, etc. Referring to the letters, written by certain members of the Executive Committee to Senior Advocate Kailash Vasdev, Arora also alleged that the minutes were not correctly recorded. He also stated that in spite of the purported recusal of Dave, he continued to control the meeting.

“Electorate cannot be betrayed, which is the most important issue in this case”, Arora submitted.

Appearing for SCBA, Senior Advocate Arvind Nigam said that he would seek instructions on this aspect.

Court’s Decision

A Single Judge Bench of Justice Mukta Gupta was hearing Arora’s challenge to his removal from the post of Secretary of the SCBA. “After all, this is between the members”, the Court said, indicating that the challenge may then be disposed off. After hearing Arora at length, the Court proceeded to adjourn the hearing to September 7. As expected, SCBA and the Bar Council of India will begin their submissions on the next date.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -