Libertatem Magazine

Libertatem: Navigating Legal Perspectives
Vrinda Katoch

Vrinda Katoch

Rejection of the Claims of the Petitioner Are Unjust, Illegal and Violative of Article 14,16 and 21 of the Constitution of India: The Andhra Pradesh H.C. 

  A.P. Sarma………petitioner A.P. GENCO ltd………. respondent  A single-judge bench consisting of honorable justice battu Devananda gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition was filed to issue any appropriate writ or writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in rejecting the petitioner’s case

Read Article »

Government To Dispose of Revision Petitions Filed Within a Period of Three Months From Date of Receipt of Order: Andhra Pradesh High Court

A single judge bench consisting of Honourable Justice K. Suresh Reddy passed order in Writ Petition no. 10659 of 2021. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner declaring the actions of the Respondent no. 2 to 5, trying to dispossess the Petitioners from the lands at the instance of the 6th Respondent who has nothing to do with the subject lands in view of the order passed by the 2nd Respondent against the same the Petitioners preferred the revision petition before the 1st Respondent herein along with stay Petition is pending as wholly illegal and arbitrary.

Read Article »

Petitioner’s Eviction Improper, Should Be in Accordance With  Procedure Established under Land Encroachment Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court

A single judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice C. Praveen Kumar passed an order on the Writ Petition no. 10145 of 2021. The Writ Petition was filed to seek issuance of a Writ of mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents in demolishing a residential house, without following the due procedure of law, as illegal and incorrect. 

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh High Court Says That Before Exhausting the Remedy Available Under Rule 35(A) Of the APMMC, The Writ Petition Cannot Be Filed Before the Court

A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the writ petition no. 9035 of 2021. The writ petition was filed against the demand notice no. 4352/Q/2009 issued by Respondent no. 3 (The deputy director of mines and geology) demanding to pay a sum of Rs. 83,12,130 towards the normal seigniorage fees, a penalty of Rs. 8,17,23,150, DMF of Rs. 24,93,639 and the merit of Rs. 1,66,243, for unauthorized excavation and transportation of road metal and building stone without obtaining the dispatch permits.

Read Article »

Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Earlier Judgement Stating Tobacco Does Not Fall Within Definition of “Food” and Police Does Not Have Any Jurisdiction To Investigate Any Offences Relating to FSSA, 2006

A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice R. Raghunandan Rao passed an order in Criminal Petition no. 2620 of 2021. The Petitioner is booked for the offences under sections 188, 273, 420, 120(B) IPC and section 58, 59, 63 of FSSA (Food security and safety act), 2006 because the Petitioner was caught storing tobacco and tobacco products. The Petitioner who is facing such charges had approached the Court for relief.

Read Article »

Mere Payment of the Challans Do Not Give Petitioner the Right To State That the License of the Mill Is Extended, Proper Application Must Be Submitted: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice D.V.S.S. Somayajulu passed an order on the Writ Petition no. 5482 of 2019 and 288356 of 2014. The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the orders issued in 2014 requesting him to vacate the present Saw Mill and shifting it 5kms

Read Article »

Impugned Final Notice Passed Without Considering Explanation of Petitioner Is Liable To Be Set Aside With Direction to Respondents To Consider Explanation: Andhra Pradesh High Court 

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy passed an order in the Writ Petition no. 8466 of 2021. The Writ Petition was filed by the Petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 31.03.2021 issued by the 2nd Respondent- The Municipal Commissioner to demolish the residential house of

Read Article »

Principles of Natural Justice Are Violated When Petitioner Was Not Furnished Documents Specifically Requested and Were Not Given Opportunity for Personal Hearing On Matter: Andhra Pradesh High Court

Excerpt A single-judge bench consisting of Honorable Justice Battu Devananda gave orders on the Writ Petition no. 6769 of 2020. The Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner against the proceedings issued by the 3rd Respondent (Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise), in which the 2B license bearing no.

Read Article »