Sejal and Yaatri

The writ petition filed by a convict succeeds as the Court finds it expedient to release the petitioner when he has not taken advantage of a furlough.

The Ahmedabad Medical Association and 44 other Petitioners have filed the present petition challenging the impugned notices and action of Respondent No. 2 in sealing the hospitals of the Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3.

The petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside of the impugned order whereby the petitioner was ordered to be sent to District Jail, Bhuj which is allowed by the Court, and the order of Sub Divisional Magistrate is hereby quashed and set aside.

A Public Interest Litigation was filed which raised many issues with relation to the COVID pandemic such as availability of drugs, oxygen supply, ventilator beds, etc.

The Petitioner prays to receive interest on the refund amount under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994 from the Respondents.

Petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by the group of petitioners are cross petitions preferred by the employers and employees in the present group of petitions, where all the appeals preferred by the employers are dismissed, and those preferred by the employees are allowed partly in the above terms.

The Health Secretary and Advocate General of Goa answered questions of the Court after a massive Covid-19 spike took place in Goa medical Hospital.

Excerpt The Court considered whether the cause of the 16-week pregnancy to be terminated, taking into account the victim’s physical wellbeing, the child’s potential complications and the victim’s social circumstances. Facts A 16-year-old girl got pregnant by the commission of a sex crime. She is now 16 weeks 2 days

Excerpt The Appellant was arrested under Section 376 (2) (n) of Indian Penal Code, Section 4, 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 and Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(w), 3(2) (v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Being aggrieved by the

Excerpt The appellant was charged for committing unnatural carnal intercourse and oral intercourse on the victim boy under Section 377 of the IPC and Sections 6 & 10 of the POCSO Act. He was sentenced to suffer RI for 10 years and to pay a fine of a sum of