Sakina Kapadia

Excerpt A legal question pertaining to commercial appeals had come to light before the High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Tourism & Transportation Development Corporation v. Swadeshi Civil Infrastructure. Facts of the Case In the present application, the Court dealt with the legal issue on the appeals

Author: Sakina Kapadia Excerpt Two petitions had been filed before the High Court of Allahabad on July 1 2020, and September 30, 2020. The petitions sought a direction to set aside the State Government’s order to extend the tenure of the UP Sunni Waqf Board by six months each. Facts

The Order had come in an injunction application filed by the St. Xavier’s Education Trust in Delhi. The Plaintiff sought ad-interim restraining order on publication of book titled ‘The Ryan School Murder‘ that was scheduled to be published on January 22, 2021. Facts of the Case The present application had

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in a case filed under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act, pending since 2018.   Facts and Submissions: The Petitioner herein had filed a protest petition

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The petition sought direction from NHAI (National Highways Authority of India) and the Uttar Pradesh Government to cut the minimum number of trees during the road development

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to have access to potable drinking water is a fundamental right. Moreover, it couldn’t be denied just because it was claimed by a person residing in an

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana sought a direction to authorities to provide adequate security cover to the Petitioner and his family members. Facts of

The Order had come in the form of a writ petition filed by Mr. Adhiraj Singh. The Petition sought direction from the High Court of Delhi to quash an FIR filed against him under the Arms Act, 1959. Facts of the Case: The Petitioner herein Adhiraj Singh Yadav was an

A Writ of Habeas Corpus had been filed by Mr. Avinash Sarvan in the High Court of Delhi. The Petition sought a direction to release the wife of the Petitioner who is illegally detained in the Children’s Home. Facts of the Case: The Petitioner herein Mr. Avinash Sarvan was a

The order had come by way of a few writ petitions filed by Former Executive Officer and Director of Reliance Infrastructure, Punit Garg. The Petition had challenged the recent move of Union Bank of India and Indian Overseas to mark the account of RTL (Reliance telecom Ltd) and RCOM (Reliance